You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 11, November 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dermatology
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

What Are the Optimal Techniques for Skin Rejuvenation?

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1328-1333.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Hypothesis: Of techniques currently available for facial skin appearance improvement, nonablative laser therapy offers subtle improvements with an excellent risk-benefit ratio.

BACKGROUND

The subtle improvements in skin texture and wrinkling after nonablative laser treatment are preferred by many patients to the more obvious improvements after ablative laser resurfacing, because the nonablative laser treatment has a lower risk of complications, shorter recovery time, and less disruption of regular activities. In 1993, the first high-energy resurfacing carbon dioxide lasers became available for skin resurfacing. These carbon dioxide resurfacing lasers effectively treat facial rhytids and actinic changes.1-2 They are used to ablate the epidermis and partially ablate the dermis, removing skin changes due to photoaging. They stimulate neocollagen formation and tissue tightening,3-4 resulting in long-term skin texture and wrinkle improvement.


 
Figure appears in full text version.
Paul J. Carniol, MD



 
Figure appears in full text version.
Brad A. Greene, MD


These and subsequent resurfacing lasers have continued to use high fluence (power density) coupled with a . . . [Full Text of this Article]

SKIN REJUVENATION TECHNOLOGIES

Radiofrequency Resurfacing (Coblation)

Radiofrequency Skin Tightening

Intense Pulsed Light

NONABLATIVE LASERS

MORE RECENT NONABLATIVE LASERS

NONABLATIVE TECHNOLOGY: PRO

NONABLATIVE TECHNOLOGY: CON

THE CARBON DIOXIDE LASER

THE ERBIUM LASER

CONCLUSIONS

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Paul J. Carniol, MD; Brad A. Greene, MD
Author Affiliations: Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, The New Jersey Medical School–UMDNJ, Newark. Dr Greene is in private practice in Newark.


RELATED ARTICLES

Defining Clinical Responses in Cosmetic Laser Surgery
Jim E. Gilmore
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(11):1333-1334.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proven Modalities for Facial Skin Resurfacing?
Stephen W. Perkins
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(11):1334-1335.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.