You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 4, April 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Neurology
 •Neuro-otology
 •Balance Disorders
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Drug Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Homeopathic vs Conventional Treatment of Vertigo—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

We thank Prof Sampson for his comments. As he mentioned in his letter, for a long time no product was approved for peripheral vertigo by the FDA. The fact that there were no appropriate treatments for Meniere disease and that vertiginous patients benefited from a nonspecific or placebo effect of therapy was yet concluded by Torok1 in 1977. In the meantime the current knowledge of the pathogenesis and treatment of vertigo and especially of Meniere disease gained increasing data quality. Twenty years later Claes and van de Heyning2 discussed the vestibular sedative, antiemetic, vasoactive, and diuretic effects of a couple of substances that are used in the treatment of Meniere disease in their review of literature. Betahistine is described as significantly more effective than placebo in 2 of 3 double-blind, randomized clinical trials, with a more favorable effect than a diuretic or piperazine comparator.2-3

Betahistine is a histamine . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLE

Homeopathic vs Conventional Treatment of Vertigo
Wallace I. Sampson
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(4):497.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.