You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 4, April 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

On Equivalence Trials and Alternative Medicine

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:403-404.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

THIS ISSUE of the ARCHIVES includes a letter1 critical of a 1998 article in this journal on a homeopathic treatment for vertigo.2 The author of the letter, Dr Wallace Sampson, raises important issues about standards for critically evaluating new treatment, regardless of whether these interventions lie in the domain of allopathic or alternative medicine.

In the original article, Weiser et al2 reported on a randomized equivalence trial comparing the efficacy of a homeopathic treatment ("Vertigoheel") with what they claimed was an active control agent (betahistine hydrochloride). In this double-blind trial involving 105 analyzable patients, they found statistically similar reductions in the frequency, duration, and intensity of vertigo attacks in both treatment arms. The authors argued that because betahistine (known in the United States as Serc) had previously demonstrated efficacy and was "standard treatment for patients experiencing vertigo," their demonstration of equivalence suggested that Vertigoheel was efficacious as well.

To appreciate . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Homeopathic vs Conventional Treatment of Vertigo
Wallace I. Sampson
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(4):497.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Equivalence and Non-inferiority Trials of CAM
Ernst
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2004;1:9-10.
FULL TEXT  

"Neurocranial Restructuring" and Homeopathy, Neither Complementary nor Alternative
Atwood
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:1356-1357.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.