You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 5, May 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Dentistry/ Oral Medicine
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Marginal Mandibulectomy vs Segmental Mandibulectomy

Indications and Controversies

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:600-603.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Hypothesis: When resecting a floor-of-mouth (FOM) squamous cell carcinoma that abuts a nonirradiated mandible, if neither clinical examination nor preoperative studies have shown evidence of bony tumor invasion and if the periosteum is histologically positive for cancer on frozen section and the underlying bone is grossly normal, a segmental resection of the mandible is required. A marginal resection is never appropriate.

BACKGROUND

Historically, when an FOM tumor abutted the mandible, a complete segment of mandibular bone was resected en bloc with the tumor.1 It was believed that the FOM lymphatics drained through the mandibular periosteum and bone to the neck, so that en bloc resection decreased the risk of later neck disease. Unfortunately, the segmental mandibulectomy left the patient with a significant functional and aesthetic deficit. Once Marchetta et al2 and Carter et al3 demonstrated that cancer spreads to the mandible by direct invasion rather than lymphatic spread, preservation or partial . . . [Full Text of this Article]

PRO

Clinical Examination

Radiographic Evaluation

Intraoperative Findings

Postoperative Function and Cosmesis

CON

Clinical Examination

Radiographic Evaluation

Intraoperative Findings

Survival

Postoperative Function and Cosmesis

BOTTOM LINE

Corresponding author: Mark K. Wax, MD, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, PV-01, Portland, OR 97201 (e-mail: waxm@ohsu.edu).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.