You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 11, November 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Law and Medicine
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Violence and Human Rights
 •Violence and Human Rights, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

What Have You Done for You Lately?

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:1243.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

AT NATIONAL or local meetings, stories abound about poor insurance reimbursements and the general decline of the state of medicine. While seemingly about money, what these discussions actually reflect is frustration over a loss of autonomy. However, while few have escaped the squeeze of (mis)managed care, how many have seized a leadership initiative to reverse the process? In abdicating our roles of physicians as community leaders, we have tacitly endorsed a culture of legislated medicine dictated by poorly informed politicians. Law is trumping sound medical practice. What have you done about it lately?

In June 2001 a jury in Alameda County, California, found a physician liable for recklessness and abuse for not prescribing enough pain medication to a dying cancer patient. The physician was ordered to pay $1.5 million for pain and suffering. The monetary award was curtailed by California's award cap to $250 000. This landmark suit was the first . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.