 |
 |

Evaluation of Childhood Sensorineural Hearing Loss in the Post-Genome World
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:88-89.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To test or not to test? In the evaluation of children with SNHL, clinicians
have pondered this same question but for different tests through successive
eras in medicine. The utility of laboratory testing, electrocardiography,
radiologic imaging, nuclear medicine studies, and subspecialty consultation
has been and continues to be hotly debated. To this ongoing controversy, we
can now add molecular genetic testing and ponder its value. In their review,
Greinwald and Hatnick raise important diagnostic, management, and ethical
questions about screening patients for mutations in Cx26 while highlighting the benefits of genetic testing. My own practice
has been influenced by my experiences in the clinic and the laboratory.
Figure appears in full text version.
|
|
|
|
|
Of the 2 categories of clinicians (those who test for everything and
those who pick and choose the tests based on history and physical examination
findings), I have historically tested for everything. The need to identify
the cause, even . . . [Full Text of this Article]
RELATED ARTICLE
The Evaluation of Children With Sensorineural Hearing Loss
John H. Greinwald, Jr and Christopher J. Hartnick
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128(1):84-87.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Ocular Findings in Children With Congenital Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Mafong et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1303-1306.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|