You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 11, November 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal

Digital Hearing Aids

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1394-1397.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Hypothesis

The increased expense of digital hearing aids, compared with conventional analog aids, is justified by the substantial advantages they provide.


BACKGROUND

The proliferation of digital technology and continued miniaturization of sound-processing hardware has led to the development of a new generation of digital hearing aids. These aids offer complex sound-processing algorithms made possible through replacement of capacitors and resistors with computer software, and are purported to offer substantial benefit over conventional analog hearing aids by being more adaptable to an individual's pattern of hearing loss. However, digital aids are up to 5 times more expensive.


 
Figure appears in full text version.
Bevan Yueh, MD


Overview of Digital Technology

A conventional hearing aid processes speech by converting the acoustic waveform into an electrical analog (Figure 1), which is then manipulated with a series of electrical components. A digital hearing aid digitizes the electrical signal into a series of numbers, which is then manipulated with computer software. This algorithm is potentially . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Assessment of Hearing Aid Outcomes

PRO

CON

BOTTOM LINE


RELATED ARTICLES

Digital Signal Processing Hearing Aids: Determining Need on an Individual Basis
Craig W. Newman
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(11):1397-1398.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

There Is No Such Thing as an "Average" Patient: Hearing Aid Technology Should Be Determined on a Case-by-Case Basis
Jack Hough
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(11):1399.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Screening and Management of Adult Hearing Loss in Primary Care: Scientific Review
Yueh et al.
JAMA 2003;289:1976-1985.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomized Trial of Amplification Strategies
Yueh et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:1197-1204.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.