You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 4, April 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Imaging Plane Angulation and Partial Volume

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In the October issue of the ARCHIVES 2 coronal computed tomographic (CT) slices of a patient "before and after successful eradication of frontal sinuses"1 appeared on the cover and on page 1094. Unfortunately, the CT plane angulation differs completely, as estimated in Figure 1. The oblique CT slice "before" shows the paired nasal bone and in the center of it, some mucosa due to the partial volume effect,2 suggesting a complete blockage of the frontal sinuses. The CT slice "after" is effectuated more vertically thus not cutting the paired nasal bone but the 2 frontal processes of the maxillary bone. Metson and Gliklich1 did not drill out the paired nasal bones that resulted in severe cosmetic damage. As Metson et al3 point out in a former publication, results of surgery in endonasal sinus therapy are easier to compare using equal CT plane angulations.


 
Figure appears in full text version.
Computed tomographic scan before and after . . . [Full Text of this Article]








HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.