You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 4, April 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Point of View
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Radiology of Head & Neck
 •Surgical Oncology
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Integrating Radiological Criteria Into the Classification of Cervical Lymph Node Disease

K. Thomas Robbins, MD
From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis.

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:385-387.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this issue of the ARCHIVES, Som et al1 outline a series of radiological parameters to be used as criteria for classifying cervical lymphadenopathy. Their recommendations are based on anatomical relationships of various head and neck structures as seen on axial images of computed tomographic or magnetic resonance imaging scans. They cite several problems that radiologists have had trying to correlate nodal disease as seen on imaging studies using the methods currently used by most head and neck surgeons. Recognizing the dilemma faced by radiologists in attempting to correlate the location of abnormal lymph nodes depicted radiologically with the assessment done by physical examination, one can understand the need for and importance of this work. Whereas some of these dilemmas are unique to the practice of radiology, many of the . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

An Imaging-Based Classification for the Cervical Nodes Designed as an Adjunct to Recent Clinically Based Nodal Classifications
Peter M. Som, Hugh D. Curtin, and Anthony A. Mancuso
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(4):388-396.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Proposal for Redefining the Boundaries of Level V in the Neck: Is Dissection of the Apex of Level V Necessary in Mucosal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck?
Hamoir et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1381-1383.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oral Cancer and Precancerous Lesions
Neville and Day
CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:195-215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Classification and Terminology of Neck Dissection
Ferlito
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:747-748.
FULL TEXT  

Neck Dissection Classification Update: Revisions Proposed by the American Head and Neck Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
Robbins et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:751-758.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.