You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 2, February 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Neuro-otology
 •Acoustic Neuroma
 •Audiology
 •Hearing Loss/ Deafness
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Radiology of Head & Neck
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

There Is a Role for ABR Audiometry in the Diagnosis of Acoustic Neuroma

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:234-235.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Doyle described the ABR audiometry technique, reviewed the literature, and compared this method with MRI, which is still the criterion standard for diagnosing small cerebellopontine angle tumors. I agree with most of the discussion but would also like to describe the protocol used by our faculty in patients with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss and state some of the reasons for our choices.


 
Figure appears in full text version.
Horst R. Konrad, MD


In our community, there are 2 hospitals and 1 freestanding radiology unit available to provide MRI scanning with gadolinium contrast and fast spin-echo, using search coils without contrast to scan the area of the internal auditory canal and adjacent brainstem. The cost of the various procedures varies as much as 50% between the 3 facilities providing these services, and in cases in which managed care does not dictate where the patient is sent, we recommend that patients obtain their scans at the institution with . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Is There Still a Role for Auditory Brainstem Response Audiometry in the Diagnosis of Acoustic Neuroma?
Karen Jo Doyle
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(2):232-234.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Status of ABR Audiometry in Acoustic Neuroma Diagnosis
Derald E. Brackmann
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125(2):235.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Auditory Brainstem Response and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Acoustic Neuromas: Costs by Prevalence
Robinette et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:963-966.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.