 |
 |

Radiological vs Endoscopic Evaluation of the Esophagus
Searching for a Second Primary Tumor
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:932-933.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
I appreciate the opportunity to comment on the article by Agrawal and Wenig addressing the relative merits of radiological vs endoscopic evaluation of the esophagus in search for a simultaneous second primary tumor in patients with head and neck cancer. While dynamic imaging using contrast material does provide a substantial amount of information relative to esophageal function as well as variations in anatomy, this study is less helpful than direct visualization when searching for the second primary tumor. As a rule, swallowing disorders are best evaluated using cineoesophagraphy and/or esophagography and mucosal lesions are best evaluated using the endoscope.
Figure appears in full text version.
|
|
|
|
|
The process of evaluating a patient who presents with a primary tumor confined to the head and neck using staging endoscopy most assuredly plays a role of extreme importance. Bypassing rigid endoscopic visualization for fiberoptic esophagoscopy substantially mitigates the risks of the procedure. In my hands this . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Screening for Simultaneous Esophageal Primary Tumors: Esophagoscopy vs Esophagography
Amit Agrawal and Barry L. Wenig
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(8):930-932.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening Patients With Head and Neck Cancer for Esophageal Cancer: A Lack of Adequate Data
Frederic W-B. Deleyiannis and Ernest A. Weymuller, Jr
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(8):933.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|