You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 4, April 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology
 •Voice Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Clinical Value of Laryngeal EMG Is Dependent on Experience of the Clinician

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:476.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

IN HIS ARTICLE, Woo states that LEMG requires complilcated equipment, but he does not really delineate the different modes of using EMG. Morphologic assessment (detecting polyphasic potentials, fibrillation potentials, etc) addresses the status of innervation and does not really require any sophisticated equipment or computerized analysis, but it does require considerable training and experience. Kinesiologic assessment is much more complicated and does require computerized storage and analysis. Single-fiber EMG (not often used in the larynx) requires more sophisticated equipment.

The "Immobile Vocal Fold Evaluation" section states that "Office-based endoscopy may not differentiate among posterior glottic stenosis, cricoarytenoid ankylosis, . . . but it can differentiate between vocal cord paralysis and fixation." If this is true, then EMG would not be needed.

The clinical applications of LEMG are still evolving. Nevertheless, it is clear that LEMG is an indispensable tool in the clinical practice of neurolaryngology. It is not a standardized . . . [Full Text of this Article]


RELATED ARTICLES

Laryngeal Electromyography Is a Cost-effective Clinically Useful Tool in the Evaluation of Vocal Fold Function
Peak Woo
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(4):472-476.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laryngeal EMG in Clinical Neurolaryngology
Charles N. Ford
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(4):476-477.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prognostic Indicators of Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis
Wang et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:380-388.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laryngology and Phonosurgery
Zeitels and Healy
NEJM 2003;349:882-892.
FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Value of Laryngeal Electromyography in Vocal Fold Paralysis
Sittel et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:155-160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.