You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 12, December 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck
 •Oral/ Maxillofacial Trauma
 •Surgery
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Trauma/ Maxillofacial Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Bone Grafting for Defects of the Orbital Floor

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:1402.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Chowdhury and Krause propose that autologous grafts are preferable to alloplastic materials. It is easy for me to support their conclusions since they agree with my own. In almost 20 years of personal experience, I have seen several extrusions of Silastic orbital implants (like the one shown by Chowdhury and Krause) resulting in difficult-to-repair deformities of the involved lower lids, while I have encountered no extrusions of autologous bone grafts. However, bone grafts can undergo resorption, resulting in delayed changes in globe position that may require later revision surgery (if so desired by the patient).

Nonetheless, it would be foolish for those of us who favor autologous bone grafting to disregard the fact that many experienced surgeons prefer alloplastic reconstruction (as evidenced by the plethora of reports citing thousands of cases of reconstructions using a wide variety of materials). Typically, as new materials are tested, several series report their successful . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Selection of Materials for Orbital Floor Reconstruction
Khalid Chowdhury and Gregory E. Krause
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(12):1398-1401.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgery of Traumatic Defects of the Orbital Floor
Robert H. Mathog
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(12):1402-1403.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.