You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 12, December 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck
 •Oral/ Maxillofacial Trauma
 •Surgery
 •Transplantation, Other
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Trauma/ Maxillofacial Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Selection of Materials for Orbital Floor Reconstruction

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124:1398-1401.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Hypothesis:

When a blowout fracture with a clinically significant orbital floor defect is repaired, autologous material is preferable for the orbital floor graft.


BACKGROUND

A clinically significant orbital floor defect will be defined as a gap remaining after reduction or elevation of orbital floor fracture fragments that requires a semirigid implant to avoid postoperative enophthalmos or orbital dystopia. Therefore, this definition excludes small defects (<5 mm in width) where Gelfilm (Pharmacia and Upjohn Inc, Kalamazoo, Mich) or fascia could be used without the need for rigid or semirigid support of the orbital contents.

Fractures involving the orbit are relatively common in individuals with facial trauma because of the prominence of the globe and periorbital region. Inadequate reduction and reconstruction can result in substantial disturbances in function and appearance if the preinjury eye position has not been restored. Treatment of orbital floor fractures aims to prevent long-term sequelae, especially enopthalmos, persistent diplopia, and . . . [Full Text of this Article]

PRO

CON

BOTTOM LINE

CONCLUSIONS



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Bone Grafting for Defects of the Orbital Floor
Robert M. Kellman
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(12):1402.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgery of Traumatic Defects of the Orbital Floor
Robert H. Mathog
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(12):1402-1403.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Endoscopic Transantral Orbital Floor Repair With Antral Bone Grafts
Nishiike et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:911-915.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Influence of Polydioxanone Foil on Growing Septal Cartilage After Surgery in an Animal Model: New Aspects of Cartilage Healing and Regeneration (Preliminary Results)
Boenisch et al.
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5:316-319.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.