You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 6, June 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Education
 •General Rhinology
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fellowship Training in Rhinology

A Survey of Fellows From the Past 6 Years

Abtin Tabaee, MD; Amber Luong, MD, PhD; Marvin P. Fried, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(6):571-574.

Objectives  To define the educational goals and determine the success of formal fellowship programs in rhinology.

Design  An anonymous, Internet-based survey of current rhinology fellows and those from the past 5 years.

Main Outcome Measure  A 5-point ordinal Likert scale was used, with higher scores being more favorable.

Results  Complete responses were collected from 46 of 70 eligible participants (66%), representing 19 fellowship programs. High overall satisfaction with the fellowship experience was reported (mean score, 4.7). Pooled scores for comfort levels with the management of medical issues (mean, 4.8) and surgical procedures (mean, 4.5) were also positive. Following completion of training, lesser levels of comfort were associated with craniofacial procedures (P <.001), frontal sinus obliteration (P <.001), and dacryocystorhinostomy (P = .002) compared with all surveyed procedures. Respondents reported a greater interest in (mean score, 4.3 vs 2.4; P <.001) and preparation for (4.3 vs 3.5; P <.001) a career in academic medicine compared with private practice.

Conclusions  The rhinology fellowship experience appears to be generally favorable in terms of meeting stated training goals and helping fellows achieve subjective comfort with medical and surgical management of rhinological disorders. Continued discussion of the goals of rhinology fellowship training is necessary.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Beth Israel Medical Center (Dr Tabaee) and Montefiore Medical Center (Dr Fried), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York; and Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston (Dr Luong).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.