You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 6, June 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •CME Course for This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •General Rhinology
 •Sleep Apnea
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Relation of Nasal Air Flow to Nasal Cavity Dimensions

Thomas Kjærgaard, MD; Milada Cvancarova, MSc; Sverre K. Steinsvåg, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(6):565-570.

Objective  To investigate the relationship between nasal cavity dimensions and airflow based on measures of acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) in a very large sample of mixed rhinologic and nonrhinologic patients.

Design  Clinical survey conducted between 2001 and 2007.

Setting  Secondary referral ambulatory center and hospital.

Patients  The study population comprised 2523 consecutive adult patients, mainly white, referred to the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway, for evaluation of sleep-related disorders (eg, snoring, sleep apnea) or chronic nasal complaints.

Intervention  The subjects underwent AR and PNIF at baseline and after decongestion of the nasal mucosa with xylometazoline hydrochloride. Questionnaires and height and weight measurements were obtained prior to the nasal recordings.

Main Outcome Measure  Associations between measures of AR (volume and area) and PNIF.

Results  Nearly linear relationships were found between PNIF in 4 categories and nasal cavity volumes and minimal cross-sectional areas (analysis of variance, P < .001; post hoc analysis, P < .01). Adjusted associations between 5 of 6 AR measures and PNIF both at baseline and after decongestion were significant (P < .001 in 9 cases and P = .03 in 1 case).

Conclusions  Our study indicates statistically significant associations between nasal cavity dimensions and PNIF. The most important structural determinant for PNIF is the minimal cross-sectional area of the nasal cavity.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway (Drs Kjærgaard and Steinsvåg), and Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway (Dr Steinsvåg); and National Resource Centre for Long-term Outcome After Cancer, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway (Ms Cvancarova).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.