You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 10, October 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other
 •Pediatrics
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Influence of Single-Trial Results on Clinical Practice

Example of Adenotonsillectomy in Children

Maroeska M. Rovers, PhD; Arno W. Hoes, MD, PhD; Sanne Klinkhamer, MD; Anne G. M. Schilder, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(10):970-975.

Objective  To establish whether the results of a 2004 trial on the effectiveness of adenotonsillectomy in children with mild to moderate symptoms of throat infection or adenotonsillar hypertrophy affected physicians' beliefs about the benefits of the operation and influenced clinical practice.

Design  Prospective prior-posterior study.

Setting  Academic research.

Participants  We evaluated beliefs prior and posterior to the 2004 trial regarding the benefits of adenotonsillectomy in a random sample of 120 Dutch otolaryngologists and 120 Dutch general practitioners.

Main Outcome Measure  Physicians were asked to give their estimates of the probability of recovery during 1 year after adenotonsillectomy or a nonsurgical strategy in 3 scenarios of children aged 3 to 4 years with recurrent throat infection, upper respiratory tract infection (with or without fever), or sleep-related breathing disorder.

Results  Ninety-four percent of otolaryngologists (n = 46) and 31% of general practitioners (n = 14) were familiar with the 2004 trial results. Posterior beliefs of otolaryngologists and general practitioners did not differ substantially from prior beliefs; overall expectations regarding the benefits of adenotonsillectomy remained high.

Conclusion  Dissemination of the 2004 trial results did not seem to affect the beliefs of physicians regarding the benefits of adenotonsillectomy.

Trial Registration  isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN04973569


Author Affiliations: Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Drs Rovers, Hoes, and Klinkhamer) and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital (Drs Rovers and Schilder), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.