 |
 |

Influence of Single-Trial Results on Clinical PracticeExample of Adenotonsillectomy in Children
Maroeska M. Rovers, PhD;
Arno W. Hoes, MD, PhD;
Sanne Klinkhamer, MD;
Anne G. M. Schilder, MD, PhD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(10):970-975.
Objective To establish whether the results of a 2004 trial on the effectiveness of adenotonsillectomy in children with mild to moderate symptoms of throat infection or adenotonsillar hypertrophy affected physicians' beliefs about the benefits of the operation and influenced clinical practice.
Design Prospective prior-posterior study.
Setting Academic research.
Participants We evaluated beliefs prior and posterior to the 2004 trial regarding the benefits of adenotonsillectomy in a random sample of 120 Dutch otolaryngologists and 120 Dutch general practitioners.
Main Outcome Measure Physicians were asked to give their estimates of the probability of recovery during 1 year after adenotonsillectomy or a nonsurgical strategy in 3 scenarios of children aged 3 to 4 years with recurrent throat infection, upper respiratory tract infection (with or without fever), or sleep-related breathing disorder.
Results Ninety-four percent of otolaryngologists (n = 46) and 31% of general practitioners (n = 14) were familiar with the 2004 trial results. Posterior beliefs of otolaryngologists and general practitioners did not differ substantially from prior beliefs; overall expectations regarding the benefits of adenotonsillectomy remained high.
Conclusion Dissemination of the 2004 trial results did not seem to affect the beliefs of physicians regarding the benefits of adenotonsillectomy.
Trial Registration isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN04973569
Author Affiliations: Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Drs Rovers, Hoes, and Klinkhamer) and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital (Drs Rovers and Schilder), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|