You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 10, October 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Functional Imaging
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Endoscopy of Upper Aerodigestive Tract
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other
 •Surgery
 •Diagnosis
 •Magnetic Resonance Imaging
 •PET/ SPECT Imaging
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Metastatic Carcinoma of the Neck of Unknown Primary Origin

Evolution and Efficacy of the Modern Workup

Joshua D. Waltonen, MD; Enver Ozer, MD; Nathan C. Hall, MD, PhD; David E. Schuller, MD; Amit Agrawal, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(10):1024-1029.

Objective  To assess the efficacy of various diagnostic modalities in detecting occult primary tumor location.

Design  Retrospective medical record study.

Setting  Academic head and neck oncology practice.

Patients  A total of 183 consecutive patients with metastatic carcinoma of the neck from an unknown primary tumor during a 10-year period, after exclusion of those with previous history of head and neck cancer, a primary tumor site evident on physical examination, or primary tumors of the neck.

Main Outcome Measures  Identification of primary tumor location by various imaging modalities and panendoscopy with directed biopsies.

Results  Primary tumor location was identified in 84 patients (45.9%). Preoperative imaging (computed tomography [CT], magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography [PET], and/or PET-CT fusion scan) identified sites suggestive of primary tumor location in 69 patients. Subsequent directed biopsy of these sites yielded positive results in 42 cases (60.9%). The rate of successful identification of a primary tumor for each of the imaging modalities was as follows: CT scan of the neck, 14 of 146 patients (9.6%); magnetic resonance imaging of the neck, 0 of 13 patients (0%); whole-body PET scan, 6 of 41 patients (14.6%); and PET-CT fusion study, 23 of 52 patients (44.2%) (P = .001). The highest yield in identifying primary tumor sites was obtained in patients who had undergone PET-CT plus panendoscopy with directed biopsies with or without tonsillectomy: 31 of 52 patients (59.6%).

Conclusion  Diagnostic workup including PET-CT, alongside panendoscopy with directed biopsies including bilateral tonsillectomy, offers the greatest likelihood of successfully identifying occult primary tumor location.


Author Affiliations: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Waltonen, Ozer, Schuller, and Agrawal) and Section of PET, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology (Dr Hall), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Dr Waltonen is now with the Department of Otolaryngology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.