You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 135 No. 1, January 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Dentistry/ Oral Medicine
 •General Rhinology
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Sleep Apnea
 •Pediatrics
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Surgery
 •Plastic Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Rapid Maxillary Expansion for the Treatment of Nasal Obstruction in Children Younger Than 12 Years

Simonetta Monini, MD; Caterina Malagola, MD; Maria Pia Villa, MD; Caterina Tripodi, MD; Silvia Tarentini, PhD; Irene Malagnino, MD; Vania Marrone, PhD; Antonio Ivan Lazzarino, MD; Maurizio Barbara, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135(1):22-27.

Objective  To assess short- and long-term effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on nasal flow in young children. Since RME has been reported to positively influence nasal obstruction in subjects with respiratory problems by reducing nasal resistance, a similar efficacy of RME could be expected in children with deciduous and/or mixed dentition who are affected by maxillary constriction and nasal obstruction from a different cause.

Design  Prospective study of children younger than 12 years, with different grades of malocclusion and oral breathing. Data included active anterior rhinomanometry in both the supine and orthostatic positions, as well as radiographic cephalometric measurements.

Setting  Tertiary care university hospital. Data were prospectively collected from 2005 to 2007.

Patients  Nasal flow and resistance were measured in 65 children younger than 12 years, with mixed or deciduous dentition and different grades of malocclusion and oral breathing.

Main Outcome Measure  Efficacy of RME for resolution of maxillary constriction.

Results  After RME, an improvement of nasal flow and resistance has been recorded in patients, in the supine position, who presented both anterior and posterior obstruction. Less notable changes were shown in isolated forms of obstruction and in the orthostatic position.

Conclusion  In cases of maxillary constriction and nasal airway obstruction, RME has proved to be efficient for the improvement of nasal respiration in children via a widening effect on the nasopharyngeal cavity.


Author Affiliations: Otorhinolaryngology Unit (Drs Monini, Tripodi, Tarentini, Marrone, and Barbara) and Dentistry and Orthodontics Unit (Drs Malagola and Malagnino), Department of Sensory Organs, and Pediatric Unit (Dr Villa), University Sapienza II School of Medicine, and Department of Public Health "G. Sanarelli," University Sapienza (Dr Lazzarino), Rome, Italy.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.