You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 4, April 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •CME Course for This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Prognostic Indicators of Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis

Chen-Chi Wang, MD; Ming-Hong Chang, MD; Ching-Ping Wang, MD; Shi-An Liu, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(4):380-388.

Objectives  To determine the possible prognostic indicators of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) and survey the timing and values of preset laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) rules for UVFP.

Design  Cohort study with retrospective data analysis.

Setting  Voice clinic of a tertiary medical center.

Patients  Complete data for 45 patients diagnosed with idiopathic or iatrogenic UVFP. The LEMG was performed between 3 weeks and 6 months from the onset of symptoms.

Main Outcome Measure  At least 6 months after symptom onset and 3 months after LEMG.

Results  Thirteen subjects showed resolved vocal fold motion (29%), and 32 had persistent vocal fold paralysis (71%). According to the LEMG decision rules proposed by Munin et al in 2003, the predictive values for positive results, negative results, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LEMG were 78.9%, 71.4%, 93.8%, 38.5%, and 77.8%, respectively. We found the false-positive rate to be as high as 50% if LEMG was performed less than 2 months after symptom onset, and only 7.7% if LEMG was performed at least 2 months after symptom onset. After excluding 14 LEMG data recorded at less than 2 months, the predictive values for positive results, negative results, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LEMG were 92.3%, 60%, 92.3%, 60.0%, and 87.1%, respectively. The predictive values of positive results and accuracy significantly improved without compromising sensitivity.

Conclusion  This study confirms that LEMG is a clinically useful tool that can offer prognostic information for UVFP especially if it is done at least 2 months after symptom onset.


Author Affiliations: School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, and Department of Medicine, Chung-Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan (Dr C.-C. Wang); Departments of Otolaryngology (Drs C.-C. Wang, C.-P. Wang, and Liu) and Neurology (Dr Chang), Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung; and Department of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan (Drs C.-C. Wang, C.-P. Wang, and Liu).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.