You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 11, November 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •CME Course for This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Middle/ External Ear Disorders
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Efficacy of Tympanoplasty Without Mastoidectomy for Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media

Benjamin D. Webb, MD; C. Y. Joseph Chang, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(11):1155-1158.

Objective  To compare the efficacy of tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) vs efficacy in those with dry tympanic membrane (TM) perforations.

Design  Retrospective controlled study based on a prospective database.

Setting  Academic tertiary referral center.

Patients  A total of 150 consecutive patients without cholesteatoma with CSOM or dry perforations alone who underwent tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy from January 2000 through December 2005.

Intervention  Tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy.

Main Outcome Measure  Perforation recurrence. Independent variables were age, surgical approach, perforation size, and revision surgery.

Results  The TM graft failure rate was not significantly worse in the CSOM group compared with the dry perforation group (P = .48). The independent variables studied were not statistically related to the success of tympanoplasty except that revision surgery was associated with a slightly reduced success rate (P = .03).

Conclusions  The success rate of tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy is at least as good for patients with CSOM as it is for patients with perforation without prior otorrhea. Age ( = .28), perforation size ( = .11), and surgical approach ( = .82) were not significantly related to success rate. Revision surgery was associated with a slightly lower success rate.


Author Affiliations: Department of Otolaryngology, University of Texas at Houston (Dr Webb), and Texas Ear Center, Houston (Dr Chang). Dr Webb is now with Alamo Ear, Nose, and Throat Associates, San Antonio, Texas.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.