You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 8, August 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Skull Base Procedures
 •Dermatology
 •Melanoma
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Atypical Facial Access

An Unusually High Prevalence of Use Among Patients With Skull Base Tumors Treated at 2 Centers

Claudio Roberto Cernea, MD; Fernando L. Dias, MD, PhD; Roberto Araujo Lima, MD; Terence Farias, MD; Ullyanov B. T. Mendonça, MD; Eduardo Vellutini, MD; Marcos Q. T. Gomes, MD; Janio Nogueira, MD; Renata R. G. Lorencetti, MD; Lenine Garcia Brandão, MD; Luiz R. M. Dos Santos, MD; Julio Morais-Besteiro, MD; Luiz Carlos Ishida, MD; Mario S. L. Galvão, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(8):816-819.

Objective  To analyze the influence of the unique percentage of skin carcinomas with skull base invasion on the choice of the facial surgical approach.

Design  Multi-institutional retrospective analysis of the medical charts of all patients who had undergone oncological craniofacial operations from 1981 to 2005. Data were collected on demographic distribution, location of the primary tumor, histologic type, type of operation, reconstruction, complications, and outcome. Special attention was directed toward the choice of facial approach.

Setting  Two major tertiary care centers.

Patients  A total of 484 patients who had undergone major skull base operations.

Intervention  Frequency of atypical facial approaches.

Main Outcome Measures  Impact on the need for more sophisticated reconstructions and on surgical morbidity.

Results  During this 25-year period, 484 patients underwent major skull base operations in the 2 centers; data concerning 467 cases were available for analysis. The median age of the patients was 52.8 years (range, 4-88 years), and the male-female ratio was 1.9:1.0. The initial location of the tumor was the craniofacial skin in 63.5% of cases, ethmoid in 10.8%, maxilla in 2.3%, orbit in 1.9%, and other origins, including endocranial, in 19.4%. The histologic type of the lesions was basal cell carcinoma in 42.0% of cases, squamous cell carcinoma in 29.5%, esthesioneuroblastoma in 5.3%, adenocarcinoma in 3.9%, adenoid cystic carcinoma in 2.8%, and other types in 16.5%. Owing to this high prevalence of advanced skin carcinomas, the most commonly employed facial approach was atypical, tailored to encompass all compromised skin and underlying tissues, in 55.5% of cases, followed by the Weber-Ferguson approach, with all its variations (eg, nasal swing) in 17.8%, lateral rhinotomy in 12.2%, facial translocation in 3.8%, and other facial techniques in 7.7%. No facial approach was required in 1.5% of cases.

Conclusion  In most situations, head and neck surgeons chose an atypical surgical approach to properly resect all facial structures invaded by very advanced skin cancers.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Cernea, Lorencetti, Brandão, and Dos Santos), Neurosurgery (Drs Vellutini and Gomes), and Plastic Surgery (Drs Morais-Besteiro and Ishida), University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil; and Departments of Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Dias, Lima, Farias, and Mendonça), Neurosurgery (Dr Nogueira), and Plastic Surgery (Dr Galvão), National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.