You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 6, June 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Neurology
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Neuro-otology
 •Neurology, Other
 •Hearing Loss/ Deafness
 •Drug Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

II. A Meta-analysis

Anne Elizabeth Conlin, BA&Sc, MD; Lorne S. Parnes, MD, FRCSC

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(6):582-586.

Objective  To pool and meta-analyze the results of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL).

Data Sources  A MEDLINE search and hand search were conducted to identify RCTs published between January 1966 and February 2006 in the English language on the treatment of SSHL. Search terms included hearing loss, sensorineural (MeSH term), sensorineural hearing loss (text words), and sudden deafness (text words).

Study Selection  Prospective RCTs on the treatment of patients diagnosed as having sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

Data Extraction  A meta-analysis using the random effects model was conducted when data existed for 2 or more studies. Odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and tests for heterogeneity were reported.

Data Synthesis  Twenty RCTs were identified, of which 5 met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Pooling of data from 2 RCTs that compared steroids with placebo showed no difference between treatment groups (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 0.89-6.84; P=.08). No difference existed between patients treated with antiviral plus steroid therapy vs placebo plus steroid therapy (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.29-2.92: P=.88). Finally, there was no difference between subjects treated with steroids vs subjects treated with any other active treatment (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.64-2.55; P=.50).

Conclusions  Despite the traditional practice in North America of treating of SSHL with systemic steroids, a meta-analysis revealed no evidence of benefit of steroids over placebo. There was also no difference in the addition of antiviral therapy to systemic steroids, nor was there difference between systemic steroids and other active treatment.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Otolaryngology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario (Dr Conlin), and University of Western Ontario, London (Dr Parnes).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: I. A Systematic Review
Conlin and Parnes
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:573-581.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.