This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Statistics and Research Methods  • Surgery  • Endoscopy of Upper Aerodigestive Tract  • Paranasal Sinus Disease  • Alert me on articles by topic

II. Assessment of Discriminant Validity and Expert Benchmarking

Marvin P. Fried, MD; Babak Sadoughi, MD; Suzanne J. Weghorst, MS, MA; Michael Zeltsan, MS; Hernando Cuellar, MD; José I. Uribe, MD; Clarence T. Sasaki, MD; Douglas A. Ross, MD; Joseph B. Jacobs, MD; Richard A. Lebowitz, MD; Richard M. Satava, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(4):350-357.

Objectives  To establish discriminant validity of the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator (ES3) (Lockheed Martin, Akron, Ohio) between various health care provider experience levels and to define benchmarking criteria for skills assessment.

Design  Prospective multi-institutional comparison study.

Setting  University-based tertiary care institution.

Participants  Ten expert otolaryngologists, 14 otolaryngology residents, and 10 medical students.

Interventions  Subjects completed the ES3's virtual reality curriculum (10 novice mode, 10 intermediate mode, and 3 advanced mode trials). Performance scores were recorded on each trial. Performance differences were analyzed using analysis of variance for repeated measures (experience level as between-subjects factor).

Main Outcome Measures  Simulator performance scores, accuracy, time to completion, and hazard disruption.

Results  The novice mode accurately distinguished the 3 groups, particularly at the onset of training (mean scores: senior otolaryngologists, 66.0; residents, 42.7; students, 18.3; for the paired comparisons between groups 1 and 2 and groups 1 and 3, P = .04 and .03, respectively). Subjects were not distinguished beyond trial 5. The intermediate mode only discriminated students from other subjects (P = .008). The advanced mode did not show performance differences between groups. Scores on the novice mode predicted those on the intermediate mode, which predicted advanced mode scores (r = 0.687), but no relationship was found between novice and advanced scores. All groups performed equally well and with comparable consistency at the outset of training. Expert scores were used to define benchmark criteria of optimal performance.

Conclusions  This study completes the construct validity assessment of the ES3 by demonstrating its discriminant capabilities. It establishes expert surgeon benchmark performance criteria and shows that the ES3 can train novice subjects to attain those. The refined analysis of trial performance scores could serve educational and skills assessment purposes. Current studies are evaluating the transfer of surgical skills acquired on the ES3 to the operating room (predictive validity).

Author Affiliations: Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (Drs Fried, Sadoughi, Cuellar, and Uribe and Mr Zeltsan); Human Interface Technology Laboratory (Ms Weghorst) and Department of Surgery (Dr Satava), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle; Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Drs Sasaki and Ross); and Department of Otolaryngology, New York University Medical Center, New York (Drs Jacobs and Lebowitz).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

High-Fidelity Patient Simulation Mannequins to Facilitate Aerodigestive Endoscopy Training
Deutsch
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:625-629.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT