You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 6, June 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck
 •Facial Plastic Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Anterior and Posterior Cartilage Graft Dimensions in Successful Laryngotracheal Reconstruction

Peter J. Koltai, MD; Byron Ellis, MA; James Chan, MD; Anthony Calabro, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132:631-634.

Objective  To describe the dimensions of cartilage grafts used for successful laryngotracheal reconstruction, with the goal of establishing appropriate sizes for "off-the-shelf" tissue-engineered cartilage grafts.

Design  A retrospective review of prospectively maintained operative illustrations of a single surgeon's experience.

Setting  Two tertiary children's hospitals.

Patients  A consecutive sample of 54 patients (tracheotomized or intubated) with a diagnosis of subglottic stenosis.

Interventions  Each patient underwent anterior (n = 30), posterior (n = 3), or anterior and posterior (n = 22) laryngotracheal reconstruction. Rib cartilage was used in 51 patients and thyroid cartilage was used in 3 patients.

Main Outcome Measure  Successful or failed extubation.

Results  Of the 54 patients, 48 (89%) were successfully decannulated. The mean ± SEM length of the anterior graft was 20.7 ± 10.3 mm, and the mean width of the anterior graft was 7.7 ± 2.5 mm. The mean length of the posterior graft was 13.9 ± 2.9 mm, and the mean width of the posterior graft was 4.2 ± 0.9 mm.

Conclusions  With the prospect of tissue-engineered cartilage implants becoming available for laryngotracheal reconstruction, the most appropriate templates for designing these implants should be based on the geometric dimensions of grafts carved from native tissues in cases that have been successfully decannulated. Based on our analysis, the use of 2-mm increments for the posterior grafts suggests a set of molds that are 2, 4, and 6 mm wide and 22 mm long. Using 2 x 2-mm increments for the anterior grafts indicates that 36 mold sizes will be sufficient for 90% of predicted cases.


Author Affiliations: Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (Dr Koltai); Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass (Mr Ellis); and Head and Neck Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (Drs Chan and Calabro).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.