You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 6, June 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Airway Obstruction
 •Pain
 •Surgery
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Microdebrider Tonsillotomy vs Electrosurgical Tonsillectomy

A Randomized, Double-blind, Paired Control Study of Postoperative Pain

Matthew T. Lister, MD; Michael J. Cunningham, MD; Barry Benjamin, MD; Michael Williams, MD; Ann Tirrell, RN; Debra A. Schaumberg, ScD, OD, MPH; Christopher J. Hartnick, MD, MS (Epi)

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132:599-604.

Objective  To examine whether microdebrider intracapsular tonsillotomy (MT) results in less postoperative pain compared with electrosurgical extracapsular tonsillectomy (ET).

Design  Prospective, randomized, double-blind, matched pair, clinical trial.

Setting  Specialty care hospital.

Patients  Twelve male (48%) and 13 female (52%) children aged 5 to 15 years, with obstructive tonsillar hyperplasia were randomized to have one tonsil removed by MT and the other by ET.

Interventions  An angled endoscopic microdebrider was used to perform MT, and ET was performed by standard monopolar cautery technique. Parents and children were blinded to the side of MT and ET. Children rated the pain 0 to 5 by side using the Faces Pain Scale–Revised. Blinded data collection was via telephone daily for 2 weeks by a study nurse.

Main Outcome Measures  Primary: postoperative pain as recorded by Faces Pain Scale–Revised; secondary, presence or absence of otalgia and postoperative bleeding.

Results  Twenty-two children (88%) had tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, while 3 children (12%) had tonsillectomy alone. On postoperative days 1 to 9, children reported significantly less pain on the MT side compared with the ET side (paired t test; P<.01). By postoperative days 10 to 14, the difference between sides disappeared. Twenty children (80%) reported otalgia, and it was always unilateral. For those children reporting otalgia, there was a 100% correlation between the side of otalgia and the side of ET. There was no posttonsillectomy bleeding among the 25 children.

Conclusion  Microdebrider intracapsular tonsillotomy is significantly less painful compared with electrosurgical ET in children undergoing surgical intervention for obstructive tonsillar hypertrophy.


Author Affiliations: Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (Drs Lister, Cunningham, Benjamin, Williams, and Hartnick and Ms Tirrell), and Departments of Otology and Laryngology (Drs Lister, Cunningham, Benjamin, Williams, and Hartnick and Ms Tirrell) and Medicine and Ophthalmology (Dr Schaumberg), Harvard Medical School, Boston.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect of Intracapsular Tonsillectomy on Quality of Life for Children With Obstructive Sleep-Disordered Breathing
Colen et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:124-127.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Microdebrider-Assisted Extended Uvulopalatoplasty: An Effective and Safe Technique for Selected Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome
Huang and Cheng
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:141-145.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.