You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 132 No. 10, October 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Cancer Reconstruction of Head & Neck
 •Dysphagia
 •Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Dermatology
 •Melanoma
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Cricohyoidoepiglottopexy vs Near-Total Laryngectomy With Epiglottic Reconstruction in the Treatment of Early Glottic Carcinoma

Cagatay Oysu, MD; Ismet Aslan, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132:1065-1068.

Objective  To compare functional and oncological outcomes of cricohyoidoepiglottopexy (CHEP) and near-total laryngectomy with epiglottic reconstruction (NTLER) techniques in early glottic carcinoma.

Design  Case series, clinical study.

Setting  Two tertiary care referral centers.

Patients  Seventeen patients with T1b glottic squamous cell carcinoma were treated with CHEP and 21 were treated with NTLER.

Main Outcome Measures  Fundamental frequency, maximum phonation time, maximum phonation intensity, Voice Handicap Index, and GRBAS (grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain) scale were used to evaluate voice. Nasogastric tube removal times and late postoperative aspiration scales were used to evaluate swallowing ability.

Results  Fundamental frequency (P = .78), maximum phonation time (P = .44), and maximum phonation intensity (P = .94) measurements were not significantly different in the 2 groups. There was also no significant difference in mean Voice Handicap Index score (P = .62), mean decannulation time (P = .25), time to nasogastric tube removal (P = .12), or clinical grades of late postoperative aspiration (P = .87) between the 2 groups. The mean Voice Handicap Index score was 55.58 in the CHEP group and 52.78 in the NTLER group. According to the GBRAS scale, overall voice quality was moderately altered in both groups. All patients were successfully decannulated. In the CHEP and NTLER groups, the mean decannulation times were 27 and 20 days, respectively, and the nasogastric tubes were removed after an average of 23 and 17 days. The overall (Kaplan-Meier) survival rate was 94% in the patients who underwent CHEP and 90% in the patients who underwent NTLER (P = .76). The disease-free survival rates were 100% and 76% in the CHEP and NTLER groups, respectively (P = .07).

Conclusions  Functional and oncological results appear to be similar with both treatment methods. If open surgery is planned, the choice between these procedures mainly depends on the experience and preference of the surgeon.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Otolaryngology, Haydarpasa Numune State Hospital (Dr Oysu) and University of Istanbul, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine (Dr Aslan), Istanbul, Turkey.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.