You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 6, June 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Paranasal Sinus Disease
 •Radiology of Head & Neck
 •Computed Tomography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Relationship Between Frontal Sinusitis and Localization of the Frontal Sinus Outflow Tract

A Computer-Assisted Anatomical and Clinical Study

Suat Turgut, MD; Ibrahim Ercan, MD; Ibrahim Sayin, MD; Muzaffer Basak, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:518-522.

Objective  To evaluate the relationship between frontal sinusitis and the localization of the frontal sinus outflow tract medial or lateral to the superior attachment of the uncinate process (UP).

Design  A retrospective anatomical and clinical study.

Setting  An ear, nose, and throat clinic in isli Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Patients  Paranasal sinus computed tomographic scans of 486 sides of the frontal sinuses (hereafter referred to as sides) of 243 patients who had chronic sinusitis were evaluated. In 125 sides (26%), the superior attachment of the UP could not be identified. In the remaining 361 sides (74%), the prevalence of superior attachment of UP types and the presence of frontal sinusitis in each side were recorded. Localization of the frontal sinus outflow tract was determined according to the superior attachment of the UP. Drainage of the frontal sinus to the middle meatus (medial to the superior attachment of the UP [types 1-3]) was classified as group 1, and drainage of the frontal sinus to the ethmoid infundibulum (lateral to the superior attachment of the UP [types 4-6]) was classified as group 2.

Results  Frontal sinusitis was found in 125 (35%) of 361 sides. The distribution of frontal sinusitis was 97 (41%) of 237 in group 1 and 28 (23%) of 124 in group 2. Group 1 drainage had a statistically significant presence of frontal sinusitis ({chi}2 = 12.11; P<.001). The prevalence of superior attachment of UP types was 63% for type 1/2, 3% for type 3, 12% for type 4, 14% for type 5, and 8% for type 6.

Conclusions  Frontal sinus outflow tract, which is medial to the superior attachment of the UP, is more common than the lateral one. There is a statistically significant relation between the presence of frontal sinusitis and the frontal sinus outflow tract, which is medial to the superior attachment of the UP.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Turgut, Ercan, and Sayin) and Radiology (Dr Basak), isli Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.