This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (12)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Sleep Apnea  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Mary Talley Bowden, MD; Eric J. Kezirian, MD, MPH; David Utley, MD; Richard L. Goode, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:440-445.

Objective  To examine the efficacy of hyoid myotomy and suspension as a treatment of hypopharyngeal obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea.

Design  Prospective, observational study.

Setting  Academic medical center.

Patients  Twenty-nine consecutive male patients with suspected hypopharyngeal obstruction

Interventions  Patients underwent hyoid suspension. Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with or without tonsillectomy was performed at the same time for those patients who had not undergone this procedure previously. Patients underwent clinical examination and sleep study prior to surgery and approximately 1 year postoperatively.

Main Outcome Measures  Primary outcome was a successful surgical result, defined as apnea-hypopnea index lower than 20, 50% or greater decline in apnea-hypopnea index, and no oxygen desaturations below 85% on the postoperative sleep study. Secondary outcomes included daytime sleepiness as determined by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the severity of snoring. Postoperative complications were also recorded.

Results  Only 5 (17%) of 29 patients achieved a successful outcome. The respiratory disturbance index did not change significantly for the group as a whole, although the lowest oxygen saturation did show some improvement.

Conclusions  Hyoid suspension does not provide results equivalent to those reported for genioglossus advancement or multisession tongue radiofrequency. Hyoid suspension alone is not an efficacious treatment for hypopharyngeal airway obstruction in most patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

Author Affiliations: Memorial Northwest Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery Associates, Houston, Tex (Dr Bowden); Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco (Dr Kezirian); Department of Veterans Affairs, Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, Calif (Drs Utley and Goode); and Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (Dr Goode).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Methodological and Statistical Problems in Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty Research: A Follow-up Study
Megwalu and Piccirillo
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:805-809.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surgical Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Upper Airway and Maxillomandibular Surgery
Won et al.
Proc Am Thorac Soc 2008;5:193-199.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Alternatives for OSAHS treatment: selection of patients for upper airway surgery and oral appliances
Boudewyns et al.
ERR 2007;16:132-145.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hypopharyngeal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea: an evidence-based medicine review.
Kezirian and Goldberg
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:206-213.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT