You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 4, April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology
 •Quality of Life
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Validation of a Quality-of-Life Instrument for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Ricardo L. Carrau, MD; Aliaa Khidr, MD, PhD; Karen F. Gold, PhD; Joseph A. Crawley, MS; Eric M. Hillson, PhD; Jamie A. Koufman, MD; Chris L. Pashos, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:315-320.

Objectives  To establish the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a new, disease-specific assessment tool, the LPR-HRQL, which assesses patient-reported outcomes (PRO) with regard to health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Design  A prospective, open-label, repeated-measures study.

Setting  Six centers in 4 states in the eastern United States.

Patients  Patients with LPR.

Interventions  Open-label treatment with 20 mg of omeprazole twice daily. Clinical and PRO HRQL data were collected. Several PRO instruments were administered to patients at each of several time points; these instruments included the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36), a general HRQL tool; the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), a symptom-specific tool for assessing voice problems; and the QOLRAD instrument (Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia), used to assess the impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Results  Factor analyses of the LPR-HRQL scales confirmed single dimensions for each. All LPR-HRQL items contributed to internal consistency of scales and had substantial variability permitting useful information. Substantial evidence of convergent and divergent validity with SF-36, VHI, and QOLRAD items was observed. Test-retest validity was adequate for the time interval tested. Changes in domain scores of the LPR-HRQL at 4 and 6 months documented its responsiveness.

Conclusions  The LPR-HRQL displays reliability, validity, and responsiveness, has face validity, and is simple and not burdensome to administer, score, and analyze. Accordingly, it may be used to assist physicians and patients in understanding the HRQL burden of LPR and the impact of therapy.


Author Affiliations: Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pa (Dr Carrau); Otolaryngology Department, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville (Dr Khidr); Health Economic Research and Quality of Life Evaluation Services (HERQuLES), Abt Associates Inc, Cambridge, Mass (Drs Gold and Pashos); AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, Del (Mr Crawley and Dr Hillson); and Center for Voice Disorders of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC (Dr Koufman).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.