You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 3, March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Education
 •Endoscopy of Upper Aerodigestive Tract
 •Paranasal Sinus Disease
 •Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Assessment of Construct Validity of the Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Simulator

Harman Arora, MD; Jose Uribe, MD; Walter Ralph, MD, PhD; Michael Zeltsan, MS; Hernando Cuellar, MD; Anthony Gallagher, PhD; Marvin P. Fried, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:217-221.

Objective  To study the relationship between performance on an endoscopic sinus surgery simulator (ES3) and fundamental perceptual, visuospatial, and psychomotor abilities.

Design  Validation study.

Setting  Tertiary care medical center.

Participants  Thirty-four medical students and 4 otolaryngology residents voluntarily enrolled.

Interventions  Subjects performed tasks on the ES3, minimally invasive surgical trainer virtual reality (MIST-VR), pictorial surface orientation (PicSOr), and 3 visuospatial tests (cube comparison, card rotation, and map planning).

Main Outcome Measures  The MIST-VR was scored for time, task error, economy of hand movement, economy of diathermy, and total score. Scores were generated for the PicSOr task and visuospatial tests. Scores were correlated with time, accuracy, and total subscore on navigation, injection, and dissection tasks, as well as hazard score and total trial score on the ES3.

Results  The PicSOr score was statistically significantly correlated with the hazard score on the ES3 (r = 0.50, P<.001). Cube comparison (r = 0.43, P<.01) and card rotation (r = 0.45, P<.01) scores correlated significantly with the ES3 trial score, as did the MIST-VR total score and the ES3 trial score (r = 0.57, P<.001). In a multiple regression model, the PicSOr, cube comparison, and MIST-VR total scores were statistically significant predictors of ES3 performance (r = 0.63, P<.01).

Conclusions  Scores on the ES3 correlate strongly with scores on previously validated measures of perceptual, visuospatial, and psychomotor performance. The ES3 provides a reliable assessment of factors that are important to the acquisition of minimally invasive surgical skills, demonstrating construct validity.


Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Dr Arora), Otolaryngology Surgery Simulator Center, Montefiore Medical Center (Drs Uribe, Ralph, and Cuellar and Mr Zeltsan), and Department of Otolaryngology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center (Dr Fried), Bronx, NY; and Emory Endosurgery Unit, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga (Dr Gallagher).







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.