You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 12, December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Airway Obstruction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aerodynamic Effects of Inferior Turbinate Reduction

Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation

David Wexler, MD; Rebecca Segal, PhD; Julia Kimbell, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:1102-1107.

Objective  To investigate the aerodynamic consequences of conservative unilateral inferior turbinate reduction using computational fluid dynamics methods to accomplish detailed nasal airflow simulations.

Design  A high-resolution, finite-element mesh of the nasal airway was constructed from magnetic resonance imaging data of a healthy man. Steady-state, inspiratory airflow simulations were conducted at 15 L/min using the techniques of computational fluid dynamics

Intervention  Circumferential removal of 2 mm of soft tissue bulk along the length of the left inferior turbinate was modeled.

Main Outcome Measures  Nasal airflow distribution and pressure profiles were computed before and after simulated left inferior turbinate reduction.

Results  Simulated inferior turbinate reduction resulted in a broad reduction of pressure along the nasal airway, including the regions distant from the inferior turbinate vicinity. In contrast, relative airflow changes were regional: airflow was minimally affected in the valve region, increased in the lower portion of the middle and posterior nose, and decreased dorsally.

Conclusion  Use of computational fluid dynamics methods should help elucidate the aerodynamic significance of specific surgical interventions and refine surgical approaches to the nasal airway.


Author Affiliations: Division of Otolaryngology, Fallon Clinic, Worcester, Mass (Dr Wexler); and CIIT Centers for Health Research, Research Triangle Park, NC (Drs Segal and Kimbell).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Inflow boundary profile prescription for numerical simulation of nasal airflow
Taylor et al.
J R Soc Interface 2009;0:rsif.2009.0306v1-rsif20090306.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Atrophic rhinitis: a CFD study of air conditioning in the nasal cavity
Garcia et al.
J. Appl. Physiol. 2007;103:1082-1092.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.