You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 11, November 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Olfaction and Taste Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Differences Between Orthonasal and Retronasal Olfactory Functions in Patients With Loss of the Sense of Smell

Basile Nicolas Landis, MD; Johannes Frasnelli, MD; Jens Reden, MD; Jean Silvain Lacroix, MD, PhD; Thomas Hummel, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:977-981.

Objective  To investigate differences between orthonasal and retronasal olfaction in patients with loss of the sense of smell without taste complaints.

Design  Electrophysiological and psychophysical testing of orthonasal and retronasal olfactory functions.

Setting  Outpatient clinics.

Patients  A series of 18 patients who had olfactory loss due to various reasons but no "taste" complaints.

Main Outcome Measures  Orthonasal and retronasal olfactory functions assessed by olfactory event–related potentials and psychophysical smell tests.

Results  Psychophysical testing revealed retronasal olfaction to be normal or slightly altered, whereas orthonasal olfaction was either absent or severely compromised. Findings from nasal endoscopic examinations and computed tomographic scans were within the reference range in all subjects. In response to orthonasal stimulation there were neither detectable olfactory event–related potentials nor any with small amplitudes, whereas olfactory event–related potentials in response to retronasal stimulation were clearly present in some patients.

Conclusion  These clinical observations, together with the psychophysical and electrophysiological findings, suggest that orthonasal and retronasal olfaction might be processed differently.


Author Affiliations: Rhinology-Olfaction Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (Drs Landis and Lacroix); and Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Dresden, Germany (Drs Frasnelli, Reden, and Hummel).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Retronasal and Orthonasal Olfactory Ability After Laryngectomy
Leon et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:32-36.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Olfactory Function Assessed With Orthonasal and Retronasal Testing, Olfactory Bulb Volume, and Chemosensory Event-Related Potentials
Rombaux et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:1346-1351.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.