This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (16)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Oncology  • Head & Neck Cancer  • Neoplasms of Head & Neck  • Quality of Life  • Radiation Therapy  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Mark El-Deiry, MD; Gerry F. Funk, MD; Sarvi Nalwa, MD; Lucy H. Karnell, PhD; Russell B. Smith, MD; John M. Buatti, MD; Henry T. Hoffman, MD; Gerry H. Clamon, MD; Scott M. Graham, MD; Douglas K. Trask, MD, PhD; Kenneth J. Dornfeld, MD; Min Yao, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:879-885.

Objective  To compare the long-term, health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy (SRT) or concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT).

Design  Matched-pair study comparing patients with advanced HNC treated with SRT or CRT at least 12 months after treatment. Patients completed 2 validated surveys addressing HNC-specific outcomes and depressive symptoms and provided information on employment and tobacco and alcohol use. Results for the 2 groups were compared using paired-sample t test and ² analysis.

Setting  University-based study.

Patients  Patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx who underwent SRT or received CRT.

Main Outcome Measures  Head and neck cancer–specific health-related quality of life from the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory and level of depressive symptoms from the Beck Depression Inventory.

Results  The matching process resulted in 27 patients in each treatment group. The HNC-specific domain scores (with higher scores representing better outcomes) for CRT vs SRT were eating, 37.8 vs 40.8 (P = .69); speech, 65.1 vs 56.0 (P = .23); aesthetics, 80.3 vs 69.2 (P = .14); and social disruption, 69.7 vs 70.6 (P = .90). Overall health-related quality of life was 64.0 with SRT and 55.0 with CRT (P = .142). For the Beck Depression Inventory (with higher scores representing worse outcomes), patients who underwent SRT had a mean score of 9.6 compared with 11.6 for patients who received CRT (P = .42).

Conclusion  As nonsurgical means of treating HNC have become more aggressive and surgical techniques have become more focused on function preservation and rehabilitation, the overall health-related quality of life resulting from these different approaches is similar.

Author Affiliations: Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Drs El-Deiry, Funk, Nalwa, Karnell, Smith, Hoffman, Graham, and Trask), Radiation Oncology (Drs Buatti, Dornfeld, and Yao), and Medical Oncology (Dr Clamon), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Acceptance of Major Surgical Procedures and Quality of Life Among Long-term Survivors of Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
Vartanian and Kowalski
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:376-379.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Influences and Predictors of Long-term Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors
El-Deiry et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:380-384.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Life After Total Laryngectomy: A Measure of Long-term Survival, Function, and Quality of Life
Woodard et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:526-532.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT