This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on ISI (1)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Medical Education  • Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other  • Alert me on articles by topic

Applicant Survey

Christopher D. Lansford, MD; Samuel R. Fisher, MD; Robert H. Ossoff, DMD, MD; Richard A. Chole, MD, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1017-1023.

Objective  To examine satisfaction with the match process and reported failures to comply with the match rules among applicants of the January 2002 Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery match.

Design  A survey was mailed to all applicants completing the 2002 San Francisco Matching Program match.

Participants  Surveys were mailed to 312 applicants, and the 151 returned surveys were entered into a database, which was then subjected to statistical analysis.

Main Outcome Measures  Survey questions asked whether the applicant matched and how highly, how well the applicant considers the match to fulfill its goals, how many interviews the applicant attended, and how many of these included perceived noncompliance with San Francisco Matching Program rules by region of the country.

Results  Satisfaction with the match correlated significantly (P<.001) to how highly the applicant matched among those successfully matching. The satisfaction among matching applicants was significantly better (P<.001) than those not matching. The 151 respondents had a total of 970 interviews. The respondents reported that they identified noncompliance with the match rules in 42 (4.3%) of these encounters. Most (87%) respondents reported full adherence to the match rules, and the degree of adherence did not correlate significantly to applicants' satisfaction (P = .71).

Conclusions  Applicants' satisfaction with the match process depended significantly on their match outcome. Rule noncompliance was rare and not significantly related to applicant satisfaction. This study suggests that otolaryngology applicants perceive high levels of satisfaction with the match and infrequent breaches of stated match rules.

From the Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (Drs Lansford and Fisher); Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt Bill Wilkerson Center for Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn (Dr Ossoff); Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo (Dr Chole). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.