You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 8, August 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Radiologic Imaging, Other
 •Pathology of Head & Neck
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Confocal Reflectance Imaging of Head and Neck Surgical Specimens

A Comparison With Histologic Analysis

W. Matthew White, MD; Marisa Baldassano, MD; Milind Rajadhyaksha, PhD; Salvador Gonzalez, MD, PhD; Gary J. Tearney, MD, PhD; R. Rox Anderson, MD; Richard L. Fabian, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:923-928.

Background  Confocal reflectance microscopy (CRM) is an optical method of imaging tissue noninvasively without the need for fixation, sectioning, and staining as in standard histopathologic analysis. Image contrast is determined by natural differences in refractive indices of organelles and other subcellular structures within the tissues. Gray-scale images are displayed in real time on a video monitor and represent horizontal (en face) optical sections through the tissue. We hypothesized that CRM is capable of discerning histologic characteristics of different tissues in the head and neck.

Objectives  To examine the microscopic anatomy of freshly excised head and neck surgical specimens en bloc using CRM and to compare the findings with those generated by conventional histologic analysis.

Design  This was a pilot observational cohort study. Bone, muscle, nerve, thyroid, parotid, and ethmoid mucosa from human surgical specimens were imaged immediately after excision. Confocal images were compared with corresponding routine paraffin-embedded, hematoxylin-eosin–stained sections obtained from the same tissue.

Results  Characteristic histologic features of various tissues and cell types were readily discernible by CRM and correlated well with permanent sections. However, in all tissues examined, there was less microscopic detail visible in the CRM images than was appreciated in paraffin-embedded histologic sections.

Conclusions  The CRM images revealed cytologic features without the artifacts of histologic processing and thus may have the potential for use as an adjunct to frozen-section analysis in intraoperative consultation.


From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (Drs White and Fabian); Wellman Laboratories of Photomedicine (Drs White, Rajadhyaksha, Gonzalez, Anderson, and Fabian) and the Department of Pathology (Drs Baldassano and Tearney), Massachusetts General Hospital; and Harvard Medical School (Drs White, Baldassano, Rajadhyaksha, Gonzalez, Tearney, Anderson, and Fabian), Boston, Mass. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.