 |
|
How Appropriate Is the OM6 as a Discriminative Instrument in Children With Otitis Media?
Haytham Kubba, MBBS, MPhil, FRCS(ORL-HNS);
Iain R. C. Swan, MD, FRCS;
Stuart Gatehouse, PhD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:705-709.
Background The OM6 is a 6-item condition-specific handicap measure developed in the United States for children with recurrent acute otitis media and otitis media with effusion. Easy and quick to use, it has high test-retest repeatability and is sensitive to change after ventilation tube insertion.
Objectives To explore aspects of the validity of OM6 in a United Kingdom population and to specifically address the instrument's ability to discriminate between children with different burdens of disease.
Design The parents of 179 consecutive newly referred children with otitis media with effusion or recurrent acute otitis media completed the OM6 on their first visit to the hospital. The parents of 72 children with sore throats completed the OM6 for comparison. Scores were compared with markers of disease severity, demographic variables, and generic quality-of-life measures.
Results Poorer scores were found in those with ear complaints than in those with sore throats. The OM6 scores were not associated with age, sex, socioeconomic class, or respondent (mother vs father). The OM6 scores did not correlate with frequency of otalgia, frequency of otorrhea, or time off school in the recurrent acute otitis media group. In the otitis media with effusion group, poorer scores were associated with bilateral B or C2 tympanometric findings but not with a better ear threshold of more than 20 dB. Correlation with a global 10-cm visual analog scale for quality of life and with the Health Utilities Index Mark III was good.
Conclusions The OM6 scores correlate well with global quality-of-life measures and are free from many potential biases. However, OM6 does not adequately reflect disease severity, which may limit its usefulness as a discriminative measure.
From the Medical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research (Scottish Section), Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.
|
