You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 5, May 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cochlear Implantation
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Pediatrics
 •Child Development
 •Psychiatry
 •Autism
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Measuring Progress in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder Who Have Cochlear Implants

Amy Isaacs Donaldson, MA; Krista S. Heavner, MS; Teresa A. Zwolan, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:666-671.

Objective  To quantify progress after cochlear implantation for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Study Design  Retrospective review of speech and language and speech perception test scores of children with autism who have received a cochlear implant at our center.

Setting  University of Michigan Medical Center, Cochlear Implant Program.

Patients  Six children, ages 3 to 16 years, who received cochlear implants at the our center. All children were diagnosed as having ASD by a neuropsychologist, either before or after receiving a cochlear implant.

Main Outcome Measures  Children participated in preoperative and postoperative speech and language and speech perception testing. A survey was administered to parents to evaluate subjective impressions of cochlear implant benefit and quality of life before and after implantation.

Results  Improved scores were recorded for children on whom standardized expressive and receptive vocabulary testing was possible. Children who could not complete standardized tests demonstrated improvement in raw scores. Improvement on the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale was noted for the 4 of 7 children who completed the scale preoperatively and postoperatively. Survey results suggested changes in responsiveness to sound, interest in music, vocalization, and eye contact following implantation. Five of the 6 families indicated that they would recommend a cochlear implant to another family in a similar situation.

Conclusions  Gains made by children in our study were small compared with the general implant population; however, when compared with themselves preoperatively, these children did demonstrate progress. Improvements in behaviors and interaction point to a quality of life benefit following implantation that is difficult to quantify.


From the University of Michigan Cochlear Implant Program. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.