You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 5, May 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cochlear Implantation
 •Hearing Loss/ Deafness
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Pediatrics
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Cochlear Implants for Children With Significant Residual Hearing

Shani J. Dettman, BAppSc, MEd; Warren A. D'Costa, BSc, MClin Aud; Richard C. Dowell, PhD; Elizabeth J. Winton, BSc (Hons); Katie L. Hill, BSpPath; Sarah S. Williams, BSpPath

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:612-618.

Background  Previous research suggests that children with pure-tone averages of greater than 90 dB hearing level and/or open-set sentence perception of less than 30% may derive significant benefit from cochlear implantation.

Objective  To evaluate postoperative speech perception benefit and bilateral-bimodal benefit for 16 children whose preimplant speech perception scores exceeded conservative candidacy guidelines.

Study Design  Preimplant and postimplant repeated-measure design.

Methods  Sixteen child subjects who obtained 30% or greater on preimplant open-set sentence material, presented live voice audition alone, were selected for this study. Preimplant pure-tone averages ranged from 73 to 110 dB in the better aided ear. Preimplant and postimplant open-set word and sentence testing was completed in quiet and with competing background noise for separate ear and binaural conditions.

Results  Fourteen of 16 subjects had improved speech perception scores across all test materials after implantation. Group means were significantly higher for all test materials. Results in the bimodal-bilateral condition were significantly higher than implant alone for open-set word tests (scored for phonemes) and open-set sentences in quiet.

Conclusion  The results of this study suggest that, with appropriate counseling and management, some children with significant residual hearing benefit from cochlear implantation, in particular improved speech understanding due to bimodal-bilateral hearing.


From the Cooperative Research Centre for Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Innovation, East Melbourne (Mss Dettman, Winton, and Hill and Dr Dowell); The University of Melbourne, Parkville (Mr D'Costa and Dr Dowell); and Cochlear Implant Clinic, The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne (Mss Dettman, Winton, Hill, and Williams and Dr Dowell), Australia. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Binaural-Bimodal Fitting or Bilateral Implantation for Managing Severe to Profound Deafness: A Review
Ching et al.
TRENDS AMPLIF 2007;11:161-192.
ABSTRACT  

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hearing-Impaired Children Under Sedation Before Cochlear Implantation
Patel et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:677-683.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.