 |
 |

Effect of Age at Cochlear Implantation on Auditory Skill Development in Infants and Toddlers
Amy McConkey Robbins, MS;
Dawn Burton Koch, PhD;
Mary Joe Osberger, PhD;
Susan Zimmerman-Phillips, MS;
Liat Kishon-Rabin, PhD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:570-574.
Objectives To investigate the effect of age at cochlear implantation on the auditory development of children younger than 3 years and to compare these children's auditory development with that of peers with normal hearing.
Design Using a repeated-measures paradigm, auditory skill development was evaluated before and 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. Data were compared with previously published data from cohorts with normal hearing.
Participants One hundred seven hearing-impaired children (age range, 12-36 months) who received a cochlear implant during clinical trials in North America.
Main Outcome Measure Auditory skill development was assessed using the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, a tool that provides a quantitative measure in children as young as newborns.
Results Infants and toddlers who receive implants show rapid improvement in auditory skills during the first year of device use regardless of age at implantation, although younger children achieve higher scores. Children who undergo implantation at a younger age acquire auditory skills nearer to those of their peers with normal hearing at a younger age. The mean rate of acquisition of auditory skills is similar to that of infants and toddlers with normal hearing regardless of age at implantation.
Conclusion Performing implantation in children with profound hearing loss at the youngest age possible allows the best opportunity for them to acquire communication skills that approximate those of their peers with normal hearing.
From the Communication Consulting Services, Indianapolis, Ind (Ms McConkey Robbins); Advanced Bionics Corporation, Valencia, Calif (Drs Koch and Osberger and Ms Zimmerman-Phillips); and Department of Communication Disorders, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (Dr Kishon-Rabin). Ms McConkey Robbins has served as a consultant to and Drs Koch and Osberger and Ms Zimmerman-Phillips are employees of Advanced Bionics Corporation. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Predominance of Genetic Diagnosis and Imaging Results as Predictors in Determining the Speech Perception Performance Outcome After Cochlear Implantation in Children
Wu et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162:269-276.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cochlear Implants for Children with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss
Papsin and Gordon
NEJM 2007;357:2380-2387.
FULL TEXT
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hearing-Impaired Children Under Sedation Before Cochlear Implantation
Patel et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:677-683.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Connexin-associated deafness and speech perception outcome of cochlear implantation.
Taitelbaum-Swead et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:495-500.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Restoration of Auditory Nerve Synapses in Cats by Cochlear Implants
Ryugo et al.
Science 2005;310:1490-1492.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Cochlear Implantation in Children Younger Than 12 Months
Waltzman and Roland
Pediatrics 2005;116:e487-e493.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|