You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 4, April 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Neuro-otology
 •Balance Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Persistent Vertigo Following Particle Repositioning Maneuvers

An Analysis of Causes

Vedantam Rupa, MS, DLO

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:436-439.

Objective  To analyze the causes of persistent vertigo following treatment with particle repositioning maneuvers (PRMs) in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Design  Prospective study of outcomes in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Study Setting  Outpatient clinic of a tertiary care referral center.

Patients  A sample of 90 consecutive patients with documented benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of the posterior semicircular canal who had persistent vertigo after at least 3 sessions of PRMs during a period of 2 weeks.

Intervention  Particle repositioning using a modified Epley maneuver.

Main Outcome Measure  Persistent vertigo following at least 3 sessions of PRMs over a period of 2 weeks.

Results  Seven patients showed partial or no improvement following treatment. The causes subsequently determined included coincident horizontal canal positional vertigo (2 cases), Ménière's disease (2 cases), persistent posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in association with cervical spondylosis (2 cases), and a posterior fossa meningioma (1 case).

Conclusions  Patients with persistent or frequently recurring positional vertigo following treatment with PRMs should undergo detailed investigation to exclude coincidental pathology for which specific treatment is required. In patients in whom no coincident pathology requiring therapy is identified, treatment options other than the PRM already instituted should be considered.


From the Department of Ear, Nose, and Throat/Speech and Hearing, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, India. Dr Rupa is currently at Alice Springs Hospital, Alice Springs, Australia. The author has no relevant financial interest in this article.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.