You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 11, November 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Note
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intralesional Cidofovir for Pediatric Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis

David L. Mandell, MD; Ellis M. Arjmand, MD, PhD; David J. Kay, MD; Margaretha L. Casselbrant, MD, PhD; Clark A. Rosen, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1319-1323.

Objective  To compare disease response among children with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) who underwent combined surgical debulking and intralesional cidofovir injections vs repeated surgical debulking only.

Design  Retrospective medical record review; follow-up range: 16 to 56 months.

Setting  Tertiary care children’s hospital.

Patients  Seven children with RRP, including 4 subjects treated with cidofovir and 3 controls matched for age and initial papilloma staging score.

Interventions  Subjects treated with cidofovir underwent combined surgical debulking and intralesional cidofovir injection every 2 months until disease remission. Control subjects underwent repeated surgical debulking at individually determined intervals.

Main Outcome Measures  Intraoperative endoscopic photographs were retrospectively assigned papilloma staging scores. Cidofovir and control group comparisons were made using nonparametric 2-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) testing, and comparisons of initial and final papilloma staging scores were made using nonparametric matched-pair Wilcoxon signed-rank testing.

Results  The final cidofovir group scores were significantly lower than the control group scores (P < .05). Within-group differences between initial and final scores were not significant (cidofovir group, P = .07; control group, P = .29).

Conclusions  Four children with RRP were safely and successfully treated with intralesional cidofovir injection. Consideration should be given to using cidofovir more widely for treatment of pediatric RRP. Larger numbers in the cidofovir and control groups are needed in future studies to determine the true impact of cidofovir on management of this disease.


Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh (Drs Mandell, Arjmand, Kay, and Casselbrant), and Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Voice Center, University of Pittsburgh (Dr Rosen), Pittsburgh, Pa.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use of Cidofovir for Treatment of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis
Derkay
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:198-201.
FULL TEXT  

Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.
Tasca and Clarke
Arch. Dis. Child. 2006;91:689-691.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.