You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 11, November 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Endoscopy of Upper Aerodigestive Tract
 •Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Voice Disorders
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Lack of Association Between Esophageal Biopsy, Bronchoalveolar Lavage, and Endoscopy Findings in Hoarse Children

David L. Mandell, MD; David J. Kay, MD; Joseph E. Dohar, MD; Robert F. Yellon, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1293-1297.

Objective  To determine the prevalence of esophagitis (based on esophageal biopsy results) and aspiration (based on bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL]) in children with hoarseness.

Design  Retrospective medical chart review spanning 24 months of 127 consecutive children (mean age, 6.9 years; range, 1.8-17 years) who presented with hoarseness to 2 attending otolaryngologists.

Setting  Tertiary care children’s hospital.

Intervention  All subjects underwent direct laryngoscopy, rigid bronchoscopy with BAL, and rigid or flexible esophagoscopy with biopsy.

Main Outcome Measures  The BAL result was considered positive if the number of lipid-laden macrophages was "moderate" or "large," and the esophageal biopsy result was considered positive if any 2 of the following 3 histologic criteria were present: basal cell hyperplasia, increased papillary height, and intraepithelial inflammatory infiltrate. Comparisons between subjective endoscopic findings and objective test results were made using the t test and contingency table analysis, where appropriate.

Results  Of the 127 children, 104 (82%) had vocal nodules; 53 (43%) had endoscopically visualized laryngitis; 36 (28%) had tracheobronchial inflammatory changes; 60 (47%) had abnormal esophagoscopy findings; 47 (37%) had a positive BAL result; and 38 (30%) had a positive esophageal biopsy result. There was no significant correlation between BAL and esophageal biopsy results (P = .11). The odds of having positive BAL or esophageal biopsy results were unaffected by the presence of vocal nodules; endoscopically visualized inflammation of the larynx, trachea, or esophagus; or symptoms or previous clinical history of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Conclusion  Positive esophageal biopsy and BAL results are prevalent among children with hoarseness, regardless of subjective upper aerodigestive tract endoscopic findings.


Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparison of Pediatric Voice Outcome Survey, Reflux Symptom Index, Reflux Finding Score, and Esophageal Biopsy Results
Simons et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:837-841.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.