This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (14)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Oncology  • Head & Neck Cancer  • Neoplasms of Head & Neck  • Skull Base Procedures  • Quality of Life  • Prognosis/ Outcomes  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Ziv Gil, MD, PhD; Avraham Abergel, MD; Sergei Spektor, MD; Avi Khafif, MD; Dan M. Fliss, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1276-1281.

Objective  To estimate the agreement between surgeons’ and lay caregivers’ quality-of-life (QOL) perceptions of patients undergoing major skull base surgery.

Design  Cohort survey of patients who had undergone anterior skull base tumor excision.

Setting  University-affiliated medical center.

Participants  Thirty-five patients and their lay caregivers participated in the study.

Main Outcome Measures  A triple survey was performed: each patient and his or her caregiver were asked to answer 35 questions related to 6 distinct QOL domains: role of performance, physical function, vitality, pain, specific symptoms, and effect on emotions. The composite health-related QOL of the patients was also rated on an ordinal scale by 3 surgeons who participated in the operation and follow-up.

Results  An overall significant agreement was found between patients’ and caregivers’ scores at the group level (mean scores of each domain) and individual level (patient-caregiver pairs) (r = 0.76, P<.001). There was a minor correlation in the effect on emotions domain and no correlation in the pain domain. We found no correlation between the surgeons’ and patients’ ratings. The operating surgeons tended to overate their patients’ QOL.

Conclusions  The study results show that the surgeon’s perception of his or her patient’s QOL is not sufficiently accurate to correctly estimate patients’ QOL status. These judgments should come from the patient or from the caregiver, whose perception can be used in clinical trials as a proxy for estimation of a patient’s QOL.

Author Affiliations: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery and Skull Base Surgery Unit (Drs Gil, Abergel, Khafif, and Fliss) and Department of Neurosurgery (Dr Spektor), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Determinants of Patient Satisfaction After Severe Lower-Extremity Injuries
O'Toole et al.
JBJS 2008;90:1206-1211.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Combined Subcranial Approaches for Excision of Complex Anterior Skull Base Tumors
Fliss et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:888-896.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT