This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (8)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Oncology  • Head & Neck Cancer  • Neoplasms of Head & Neck  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Findings From Linked SEER-Medicare Data

Kathleen Lang, PhD; Joseph Menzin, PhD; Craig C. Earle, MD; Jerilynn Jacobson, MA; Ming-Ann Hsu, MPH

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1269-1275.

Objective  To evaluate the excess mortality, resource use, and costs associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) among elderly Medicare beneficiaries.

Design  Retrospective cohort analysis using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute and Medicare claims.

Subjects  Study cohorts included patients aged 65 years and older who were newly diagnosed as having SCCHN in a SEER registry between 1991 and 1993 (N = 4536) and controls matched 1:1 by age and sex. Patients were followed up for 5 years or until death, whichever occurred first.

Results  Initial treatment was primarily surgery and/or radiation among patients with early-stage SCCHN, with only modest use of chemotherapy. Patients with SCCHN had significantly (P<.001) higher 5-year mortality (64% vs 25%) and health care costs than controls. Average Medicare payments (1998 US dollars) among patients with SCCHN were $25 542 higher than those of matched comparison patients (P<.001), with monthly payments 3 times as high ($1428 vs $446). Patients diagnosed as having advanced SCCHN had shorter survival times (5-year mortality, 85%, 75%, 47%, and 35% among patients diagnosed as having distant, regional, local, and in situ cancer, respectively) and higher costs (average total Medicare payments, $53 741, $58 387, $42 698, and $37 434, respectively).

Conclusion  These results suggest that the health economic burden of SCCHN is substantial, with costs that are comparable with or higher than those of other solid tumors.

Author Affiliations: Boston Health Economics Inc, Waltham, Mass (Drs Lang and Menzin); Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass (Dr Earle); Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Mass (Ms Jacobson); and Pfizer Inc, Groton, Conn (Ms Hsu).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Topical Application of a Bioadhesive Black Raspberry Gel Modulates Gene Expression and Reduces Cyclooxygenase 2 Protein in Human Premalignant Oral Lesions
Mallery et al.
Cancer Res. 2008;68:4945-4957.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of a Topically Applied Bioadhesive Berry Gel on Loss of Heterozygosity Indices in Premalignant Oral Lesions
Shumway et al.
Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14:2421-2430.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Criterion Validity of Medicare Chemotherapy Claims in Cancer and Leukemia Group B Breast and Lung Cancer Trial Participants
Lamont et al.
JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:1080-1083.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT