 |
|
Long-term Quality-of-Life Evaluation After Head and Neck Cancer Treatment in a Developing Country
José Guilherme Vartanian, MD;
André Lopes Carvalho, MD, PhD;
Bevan Yueh, MD, MPH;
Antonio Vitor Martins Priante, MD;
Rosana Leite de Melo, MD;
Luiz Maurício Correia, MD;
Hugo Fontan Köhler, MD;
Julia Toyota, RN;
Ivonete S. Giacometti Kowalski, RN, PhD;
Luiz Paulo Kowalski, MD, PhD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1209-1213.
Objective To evaluate the long-term quality of life of patients treated for head and neck cancer at a single institution in a developing country.
Design Cross-sectional analysis of a consecutive series of patients.
Setting Tertiary cancer center hospital in Brazil.
Patients Eligible subjects included patients treated between 1974 and 1999 for head and neck carcinoma who had a minimum disease-free survival of 2 years and who completed a Portuguese version of the University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) questionnaire.
Main Outcome Measures Descriptive analyses of the results and comparisons of the scores for each UW-QOL domain, stratified by tumor site, were performed using nonparametric tests.
Results Findings from 344 patients were analyzed. Of the study population, 140 (41%) had survived 2 to 5 years, 125 (36%) had survived 5 to 10 years, and 79 (23%) had survived more than 10 years since treatment. Primary tumor sites were in the oral cavity in 43.3% of cases, the oropharynx in 20.9%, the larynx in 32.0%, and the hypopharynx in 3.8%. In terms of treatment, 33.1% underwent surgery alone; 16.9%, radiotherapy alone; and 50% underwent combined treatment. Overall, 78.5% of the patients classified their own health as good or excellent. Stratified analysis showed that impairment in chewing and swallowing was more common in patients with oral and oropharyngeal tumors than in those with larynx and hypopharynx tumors, and speech impairment was more frequently related to patients with larynx and hypopharynx tumors than to those with oral and oropharynx tumors. In all tumor sites, the composite scores were significantly worse in advanced tumors than early stage tumors, but the use of combined treatment had the greatest negative impact on quality-of-life scores, after we adjusted for T and N stage with multivariable analyses (P<.001).
Conclusions The Portuguese version of the UW-QOL questionnaire was an effective tool to evaluate quality of life in a Brazilian population. Although many patients reported some limitations, most reported a good to excellent long-term quality of life.
From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital do Câncer A. C. Camargo, São Paulo, Brazil (Drs Vartanian, Carvalho, Priante, de Melo, Correia, Köhler, I. S. G. Kowalski and L. P. Kowalski and Ms Toyota); and Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Healthcare System and Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle (Dr Yueh). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Clinical Predictors of Quality of Life in Patients With Initial Differentiated Thyroid Cancers
Almeida et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:342-346.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Acceptance of Major Surgical Procedures and Quality of Life Among Long-term Survivors of Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
Vartanian and Kowalski
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:376-379.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Changes in Quality of Life Over 1 Year in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
Ronis et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:241-248.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Socioeconomic Effects of and Risk Factors for Disability in Long-term Survivors of Head and Neck Cancer
Vartanian et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:32-35.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
