You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 1, January 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •PET/ SPECT Imaging
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Radiology of Head & Neck
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Positron Emission Tomography in the Early Follow-up of Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Gerhard W. Goerres, MD; Daniel T. Schmid, MD; Florian Bandhauer, MD; Pia U. Huguenin, MD; Gustav K. von Schulthess, MD, PhD; Stephan Schmid, MD; Sandro J. Stoeckli, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:105-109.

Objective  To assess the clinical effect of an early follow-up positron emission tomography (PET) examination at the time of the first routine clinical control in patients with advanced-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Design  Prospective, nonrandomized, case-control study.

Setting  Single referral center.

Patients and Intervention  A total of 26 patients (mean age, 56 years) with histologically confirmed stage III-IV HNSCC underwent PET before and approximately 6 weeks after the end of a combined treatment with radiation and chemotherapy with curative intent. The PET findings were confirmed by histologic analysis and a 6-month clinical follow-up.

Main Outcome Measures  The presence of distant metastases, secondary synchronous cancers, and residuallocoregional tissue was confirmed, and the effect on further clinical management was assessed.

Results  Using PET, we correctly identified residual tumor tissue, distant metastases, or a second primary tumor in 10 patients, 5 of whom had no clinical evidence of such findings. Results were true negative in 14 cases; false positive in 1; and false negative in 1. Sensitivity and specificity for follow-up PET scans were 90.9% and 93.3%, respectively. All patients with positive findings were evaluated for further treatment such as salvage surgery.

Conclusions  Whole-body PET scanning approximately 6 weeks after completion of a combined treatment regimen with radiation and chemotherapy can reliably identify locoregional residual cancer and distant metastases or secondary tumors in patients with advanced-stage HNSCC and has a direct influence on management decisions.


From the Division of Nuclear Medicine (Drs Goerres, D. Schmid, and von Schulthess) and the Departments of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Bandhauer, S. Schmid, and Stoeckli), and Radiation Oncology (Dr Huguenin), University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.


RELATED ARTICLE

Imaging Literature and Terminology: When Is It Residual Cancer and When Recurrence?
Gerhard W. Goerres and Sandro J. Stoeckli
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(1):120-121.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Assessing the Neck After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locoregional Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
Ong et al.
JNM 2008;49:532-540.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Feasibility of 18F-FDG PET Scans 1 Month After Completing Radiotherapy of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Kim et al.
JNM 2007;48:373-378.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Management of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck and Thyroid Carcinoma
Quon et al.
JNM 2007;48:58S-67S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Combined PET-CT in the Head and Neck: Part 2. Diagnostic Uses and Pitfalls of Oncologic Imaging
Fukui et al.
RadioGraphics 2005;25:913-930.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Role of 18FFDG PET/CT in the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers: Posttherapy Evaluation and Pitfalls
Kapoor et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2005;184:589-597.
FULL TEXT  

Imaging Literature and Terminology: When Is It Residual Cancer and When Recurrence?
Goerres and Stoeckli
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:120-121.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.