You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 9, September 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Facial Nerve Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Videomimicography

The Standards of Normal Revised

Pavel Dulguerov, MD; Desheng Wang, MD; Thomas V. Perneger, MD; Francis Marchal, MD; Willy Lehmann, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:960-965.

Background  Studies aiming to objectively evaluate facial movements have focused on the technique of measurement, whereas the most pertinent measurements of basic facial movements have not been well characterized.

Objective  To determine the best normal measures of 5 basic facial movements in healthy patients.

Methods  In 5 healthy subjects, 11 facial landmarks were placed on the face, and 5 movements (forehead lift, eye closure, nose wrinkling, lip puckering, and smiling) with maximal contraction force were requested. Each subject repeated each movement 3 times, and the entire session was repeated on 4 different days. No specific immobilization of the head was performed. The session was filmed with a digital camera, and the frames with maximal movement were selected. Measurements were performed with Osiris public domain image analysis software. For each measure, the change from rest was computed. Intersubject and intrasubject variability were determined by a multivariate analysis of variance.

Results  In all movements, surface changes (mean ± SD) were higher than distance changes. For forehead lifting and eye closure, the best measure was the eye surface changes of 13% ± 5% and -32% ± 9%, respectively. For nasal wrinkling, lip puckering, and smiling, the best measures were the paranasal area (change, –28% ± 9%), upper lip area (change, –23% ± 8%), and mouth area (change, 63% ± 21%), respectively. Most distance changes were below 10%. Same-day repeatability variation was below 15%, and day-to-day repeatability variation was below 7%. In healthy subjects, more than 80% of the total variation was accounted for by the intersubject variability.

Conclusions  Videomimicography is a simple and objective linear measurement system based on facial surface changes. The measures exhibit good reliability.


From the Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Drs Dulguerov, Wang, Marchal, and Lehmann) and the Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (Dr Perneger), Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Agreement between clinical and electromyographic assessments during the course of peripheric facial paralysis
On et al.
Clin Rehabil 2007;21:344-350.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.