You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 9, September 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ultrasonography
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Role of Ultrasonography in Diagnosis and Differentiation of Pleomorphic Adenomas

Work in Progress

Ewa J. Bialek, MD, PhD; Wieslaw Jakubowski, MD, PhD; Grazyna Karpinska, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:929-933.

Objective  To estimate the utility of ultrasonography in diagnosis and differentiation of pleomorphic adenomas.

Design  From the group of 88 patients examined by ultrasound, who were referred because of the tumor in the preauricular area, submandibular area, or cheek, pleomorphic adenoma was finally diagnosed in 24 (with multiple recurrent tumors in 2 patients).

Results  Ultrasound was able to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions with 96% accuracy in this study. Predicting that the detected tumor was pleomorphic adenoma was possible with up to 84% accuracy. In 15 of 22 patients with primary pleomorphic adenoma, ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. High-resolution probes and harmonic imaging enabled demonstrationof histopathologic heterogeneity of pleomorphic adenomas (in 16 primary tumors [73%]). Of primary pleomorphic adenomas, 95% (21/22) had 5 or fewer vessels detectable in the whole lesion.

Conclusions  Modern ultrasound is highly valuable, useful, and reliable in differential diagnosis of tumors in the preauricular area, submandibular area, and cheek. It enables precise localization, measurements, and assessment of the structure of lesions. It may be the first and last imaging method needed to formulate the final diagnosis, or it may guide fine-needle aspiration biopsy. In many cases, ultrasound may also suggest the nature of the tumor.


From the Department of Diagnostic Imaging, II Medical Division, Medical University of Warsaw (Drs Bialek and Jakubowski), and Department of Pathology, Bródnowski Hospital (Dr Karpinska), Warsaw, Poland. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.


RELATED ARTICLE

Evaluation of a Patient With a Parotid Tumor
Willard E. Fee, Jr and Lynn E. Tran
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(9):937-938.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

US of the major salivary glands: anatomy and spatial relationships, pathologic conditions, and pitfalls.
Bialek et al.
RadioGraphics 2006;26:745-763.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of a Patient With a Parotid Tumor
Fee and Tran
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:937-938.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.