You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 3, March 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Life
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Cost-effectiveness of Hearing-Aid Fitting in the Netherlands

Manuela A. Joore, PhD; Hans van der Stel, PhD; Hans J. M. Peters, PhD; Gijs M. Boas, PhD; Lucien J. C. Anteunis, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:297-304.

Objective  To determine the cost-effectiveness of hearing-aid fitting.

Design  Cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model based on aggregate data and results from a prospective intervention study.

Setting  The cost-effectiveness study was based in the general community. The prospective study was hospital based, as 85% of the first-time hearing-aid users attend a hospital in the process of hearing-aid fitting.

Patients  The prospective intervention study included adult first-time hearing-aid users with no contraindications for hearing-aid use.

Intervention  The usual process of hearing-aid fitting in the Netherlands.

Main Outcome Measure  Costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The QALYs were based on EuroQol scores. We included direct and indirect costs in the analysis.

Results  The mean improvement on the EuroQol measure was 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.03 to 0.08), and on the hearing-specific visual analog scale, 0.27 (95% CI, 0.22-0.31). The base-case outcome based on the EuroQol was €15 807/QALY (US $17 072/QALY) (CI, -€24 239/QALY to €3718/QALY).

Conclusions  On the basis of this base-case estimate, fitting of hearing aids is considered a cost-effective health care intervention. The CI indicates that the result is not unambiguously positive, probably because the EuroQol lacked sensitivity for the evaluation of hearing-aid fitting. Until now, no study has found an effect of hearing-aid fitting on generic quality of life. Therefore, measures are needed that are suitable for the evaluation of the effects of interventions for sensory disabilities, such as the fitting of hearing aids, on generic quality of life.


From the Departments of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (Dr Joore) and Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Dr Anteunis), University Hospital Maastricht, the Department of Quantitative Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Maastricht (Drs van der Stel and Peters), and the Maastricht Health Economics Research and Consultancy Agency (Dr Boas), Maastricht, the Netherlands.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Active Middle-Ear Implantation in Hearing-Impaired Patients With Severe External Otitis.
Snik et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:1210-1215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.